A Web-Based Student Learning Outcome Assessment System for Secondary Education: Design, Development, and Empirical Evaluation
Keywords:
Web-Based Assessment, Learning Outcomes, Secondary Education, Educational Information Systems, Digital AssessmentAbstract
Student learning outcome assessment is an essential component in ensuring the quality of learning and accountability in secondary education. However, in practice, many schools still implement fragmented, semi-manual assessment systems, resulting in low efficiency, poor data accuracy, and limited pedagogical use of assessment results. This study aims to design, develop, and empirically evaluate an integrated web-based student learning outcome assessment system to support assessment management in secondary schools. The study used a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative system development and quantitative evaluation. The system was developed using the Waterfall model and Unified Modeling Language (UML). Empirical evaluation was conducted through system trials with 20 students as end users and validation by media, information technology, and language experts. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The results show that the developed system has a very high level of feasibility in terms of usability, functional reliability, and language clarity, and can improve assessment management efficiency while minimizing data inconsistencies. These findings have global implications for the development of efficient and sustainable digital assessment systems, particularly in developing countries with limited resources and varying levels of technological readiness.
Downloads
References
Adigüzel, O.C., Esen, E., & Karagöl, .Ibrahim. (2025). The impact of online feedback on student learning outcomes: a meta-analysis study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-025-10099-2
Alamr, S. M., Leon-Urrutia, M., & Carr, L. A. (2023). E-assessment in Computer Science Higher Education. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Educational Technology and Computers, 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1145/3629296.3629357
Alhazbi, S., Al-ali, A., Tabassum, A., Al-Ali, A., Al-Emadi, A., Khattab, T., & Hasan, M.A. (2024). Using learning analytics to measure self-regulated learning: A systematic review of empirical studies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1658–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12982
Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Educational Technology, 8(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008
Altintacs, Ö. (2022). The use of open-ended items for giving feedback during the formative assessment process. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(Special Issue), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1132981
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competency frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
Çeken, B., & Tacskin, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
Creswell, J. W., & Inoue, M. (2025). A process for conducting mixed methods data analysis. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 26(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.736
Drugova, E., Zhuravleva, I., Zakharova, U., & Latipov, A. (2024). Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12894
El Marsafawy, H., Roy, R., & Ali, F. (2022). Measuring learning outcomes: bridging accreditation requirements and LMS functionalities. Quality Assurance in Education, 30(4), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-11-2021-0186
Gnambs, T., Stein, J.-P., Appel, M., Griese, F., & Zinn, S. (2025). An economical measure of attitudes towards artificial intelligence in work, healthcare, and education (ATTARI-WHE). Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100106
Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
Hasan, K., Juhana, AMP, Devara, MZ, & Dewi, MA (2025). User Experience Analysis of Sports Community Management Applications Using System Usability Scale (SUS) Method. 2025 Tenth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC68054.2025.11309544
Kucs, Z., & Mert, H. (2024). Digital competence of educators in Turkey according to European digital competence framework. Journal of Learning and Teaching in the Digital Age, 9(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1301592
Laplante, P. A., & Kassab, M. (2022). Engineering requirements for software and systems. Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003129509
Margiene, A., & Ramanauskaite, S. (2022). Automated e-assessment: students' needs and e-evaluation solution possibilities. International Journal of Information and Educational Technology, 12(3), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.3.1612
Mohan, R. (2023). Measurement, evaluation and assessment in education. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Mokhtar, R., & Khayyat, M. (2022). A Comparative Case Study of Waterfall and Agile Management. SAR Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18421/SAR51-07
Mutluer, C. (2023). The effect of using E-portfolios on the self-regulation skills of students: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 14(Özel Say{i}), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1267809
Natarajan, T., & Pichai, S. (2024). Transition from waterfall to agile methodology: An action research study. IEEE Access, 12, 49341–49362. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3384097
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., Pinedo, L., & Fernández-Castilla, B. (2023). Effects of rubrics on academic performance, self-regulated learning, and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4
Ropohl, M., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2022). Formative assessment. In Physics education (pp. 413–437). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87391-2_15
Takona, J.P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2
Tracey, B., & Francesca, G. (2019). Educational Research and Innovation Educating 21st Century Children Emotional Well-being in the Digital Age: Emotional Well-being in the Digital Age. OECD publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b7f33425-en
Tuna Pusa, E., & Dinçer, S. (2025). A Meta-synthesis Study on the Use of e-assessment Tools in Education. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251360496. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251360495
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., & Sullivan, Y. (2024). Conducting mixed-methods research. Virginia Tech Publishing. https://doi.org/10.21061/conducting-mixed-methods-research
Wahas, YMA, & Syed, AJA (2024). E-assessment challenges during e-learning in higher education: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14431–14450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12421-
Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2023). Team-based mobile learning supported by an intelligent system: Case study of STEM students. In Cross Reality (XR) and Immersive Learning Environments (ILEs) in Education (pp. 5–21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003457121-2
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Ryan Sadhana, Alexandre Freire

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








